Many people are unable to solve problems because, quite simply, they do not
know how to solve problems. They may not even know what it means
to solve problems.
It is important to give people the widest possible exposure to problems and
their ways of being solved; and to dramatize the extent to which problems have
been and are being solved. But how might this be done? What can be done to radically
improve upon the existing situation?
Some individuals will object that there is only so much that can be taught,
that students can easily be overwhelmed with too many problems and methods,
that if what is presented is too diverse it will lead to overgeneralization,
superficiality, and a chaos of the mind.
Yet is there necessarily a limit to the amount that we can be taught? Might
not the amount ultimately depend upon the ways in which things are taught or
upon our capacity to innovate? Can we speak of overgeneralization without knowing
the degree of generality that is intrinsic to nature or that the universe demands
of mankind?
Traditional answers to these questions may be corrupted by fallacies and preconceptions.
Many are the great questions that have long since been answered - erroneously.
Few problems - if any - are truly elementary. Most can be decomposed intro two
or more component problems or sub-problems, which may be analyzable in turn
into series, clusters, and networks of problems of lesser and lesser order or
of ever greater number, diversity, specialization, or disconnection.
Problems seemingly or truly insoluble at one level may be soluble at some quite
different level; or they may require solutions at many levels simultaneously
and cooperatively. They may require one to work back and forth between a set
of levels sequentially and perhaps improvisatorially.
Problems can likewise be decomposed into elements that would not ordinarily
be described as problems. The number of these elements may be finite or virtually
infinite. In the latter case there may exist subsets whose discovery and exploitation
permits one or more, often subtle and surprising solutions to the problem. But
in either case the problem may be solvable via few or many combinations, permutations,
or transformations of the elements or subsets of the elements; indeed the problem
may have originated from, or be a matter of, the combinations or their kith.
Many problems are in an analogous way presided over or derived from larger or
higher-order problems, or systems or series thereof. Their alternative, best,
or necessary solution may likewise be vicarious or conjoint, or involve the
solving or curtailment of the super-problem or meta-problem.
Many apparent problems are really pseudo-problems: an illusion of a problem
produced through ignorance, misunderstanding, one's own designedly constructive
or innocent actions, a misrepresentation of the problem or situation, or a simple
failure to treat the problem as inconsequential or interchangeable with equivalent
or quasi-equivalent problems.
Many problems are in fact but reincarnations of oneself, or unconscious externalizations
and anamorphoses of one's internal problems; for being such they can seem all
the more real and at once special and specially important (which they may not
be). Problems of this sort may require one to investigate and alter oneself.
Problems of a purely relative nature are common. Their appearance, essence,
importance, or very existence may depend upon or derive from the appearance,
essence, structure, tendencies, complementarities, or effective prejudices of
the environment, circumstances, or larger context in which the problems are
encountered or which one shares with the problems.
Most of the time problems are understood and solved only in the most superficial,
expedient, elementary, formal, and supposititious way; that there are deeper
problems and solutions may not even be realized. Possible consequences of
this are many: Bad habits form that could be avoided; Collective
knowledge becomes less integral, fundamental, and reliable; Revolutionary possibilities
are overlooked or discounted; Existence - ways of doing things - become needlessly
complex; Problems are mailed to others; Mental skills are left undeveloped;
Cowardice becomes institutionalized; Etc.
Ideonomy can take a random or particular problem and reveal the scope, complexity,
and profundity - the universal grandeur - of that didactic problem in a fantastic
and unforgettable way. Nothing rivals the instructive power of a memorable example.
Problems can be transformed into other problems and other types of problems,
and back into themselves. Knowledge of the local and universal transformations
of problems - which can be cultivated, systematized, and taught - can aid the
classification, analysis, synthesis, and reduction of problems and even enable
them to be exploited. No form of knowledge is more powerful than dynamical knowledge
of a thing, which affords true mastery.
If one knows about all of the possible transformations of problems, those problems
or their equivalents can be recognized whenever and wherever they occur in nature
or human experience; and all that one knows about those problems from their
occurrence or feasibility in other contexts and domains can potentially be imported
and made use of in specific situations.
General types (and causes) of problems include: Excess, redundancy, oversupply,
or overproduction; Deficiency, underproduction, lack of redundancy, limitation,
or boundaries; Absence of boundaries, constraints, rules, order, control, or
government; Blindness, inattention, ignorance, lack of feedback, etc; Stupidity,
poor planning, fallacies, etc; Error; Conflict, contradiction, antagonism, opposition,
friction, obstacles, or interference; Accidents, surprise, or disaster; Damage,
loss, wear, or failure; Instability, change, or deviation; Bad timing; Crisis;
Pathology; Contamination; Confusion among things; Overreaction; Disrepair or
maladjustment; Isolation; Overburdened condition; Haste; Stagnation; Indecision;
Overdependence; Congestion; Undesirable or excessive feedback; Etc.
Recurring types of solutions to problems include: compromise, prevention,
mitigation, ignoration or hiding of the problem, approximation, containment,
revisualization, restructuring of a situation, etc.
Bring To Light Important Omissions and
Neglects
What does not exist? What is it that things are not? What in human history or
existence has been omitted or neglected?
What most certainly has been neglected is this very set of negative questions,
or attempts to answer these questions in any serious, comprehensive, and systematic
way.
Yet negative things are not necessarily inferior in importance to positive ones,
and in many respects both are profoundly complementary to one another.
Attempts to define what is nonexistent often lead to the discovery of things
whose existence was neither known nor suspected and that may not even have been
imagined. And on the other hand, research that seeks to discover, map, and understand
the existence of things frequently reveals the surprising or unsurprising absence,
invalidity, or partiality of various things, of a related or different nature.
Yet if things--even nonexistent things--are not deliberately sought they may
never be found or they may only be found belatedly.
The things that are missing or neglected may be essential to human reason
or purpose, or to the plenitude of the universe: some piece of a theory,
some corollary of a postulate, some proper element of human nature or of civilization,
some variation within a musical composition without which its statement of an
aesthetic idea will remain incomplete or disturbingly self-ignorant, some residual
physical particle needed to complete and vindicate a group-theoretic scheme,
some link in a lengthy mathematical proof, some exception to a rule or relationship,
etc.
A surprise may be that the set of things that are nonexistent is larger than
the set of existent things; in which case it may actually be more important.
Then again, an important discovery may be made that there is nothing that is
nonexistent, either because other things are fundamentally impossible or meaningless,
or because all possible things have a surprisingly great tendency to exist,
or factually coexist for some surprising or unknown reason.
The existence, discovery, or achievement of things characteristically blinds
one to the entire realm of the nonexistent; and what is worse, it blinds one
to the fact of one's blindness, or even to the knowledge of what it would be
mean to be sighted.
We have discovered vitamins, organic substances a small quantity of which is
essential to the nutrition--to the survival or health--of certain species
of organisms, although as nutrients they contribute neither energy nor building
units. Yet attention to this class of indispensable nutrients has probably diverted
science from the parallel discovery, investigation, and exploitation of a class
of analogous but not strictly--or at all--essential nutrients: e.g. organic
substances merely contributory to the vitality of the species, or key to a subpopulation
within the species, or part of various substituent groups or groups of substituents
collectively encompassing masked nutritional needs.
Years of research and tremendous ingenuity may go into the development of a
sealant for the cylindric parts of a rocket, yet the possible effects of frigid
weather upon that sealant may be overlooked, and this omission or neglect may
eventually lead to a disaster.
For decades ever more powerful serial computers may be developed, but single-minded
concentration upon the evolution of such computers, and spectacular accomplishments
ensuant upon their use, may perpetuate and solidify ignorance of alternative,
non-serial (massively parallel) architectures for computers and of the unique
powers and possibilities they might have.
Historically the tree of science has shown a tragic tendency to rashly branch
and grow in only one direction, to the neglect--or without any apparent awareness--of
complementary or synergistic alternatives, and science has needlessly wasted
much time in backtracking and rebalancing itself. Moreover, many great imbalances
have probably gone uncorrected to the present day and done incalculable harm.
We think of human reason as pure and general, and yet it is quite likely that
the neurological evolution of animals has ultimately equipped Homo sapiens
with a brain that is very specialized and idiosyncratic, and for which many
forms of logic--needed to understand different facets of nature--are difficult
or impossible. This chance and conceivably grotesque brain of ours, moreover,
may preclude the future emergence of dimensions of human behavior and character
that are of the utmost importance to the perfection of civilization. Yet it
might be necessary for one to possess such dimensions to fully appreciate their
importance.
Ideonomy permits one to know many things indirectly that cannot be known directly
or in conventional ways. It enables one's knowledge of what one knows to be
transformed into knowledge about what one does not know. It allows knowledge
to be amplified in a variety of ways. Through it one can acquire vital prior
knowledge about the fundamental possibilities for knowledge.
Possible separate and combined reasons for the nonexistence of things include:
mutual exclusion, past extinction, abortion, chance, lack of preparation, untimeliness,
inadequate resources, lack of a proper environment or regime, enemies or antagonistic
conditions, excluded paths or directions or irreversible evolution, illusory
nonexistence (mere hiddenness), lack of a trigger or of a 'seed' or beginning,
contradictoriness, past transmutation, virtual nonexistence within a limited
frame of reference, self- destructiveness, oversight, etc.
Some recurring questions when treating omissions and neglects are: What
else was neglected--or was anything else neglected? If the thing was
formerly neglected, should it be neglected now or in the future? Should something
else be (or have been) neglected instead? What were all of the costs and risks
of the omission or neglect? What good is associated with the neglect? What kind,
or kinds, of neglect did the neglect represent? What causes a neglect? What
are all of the effects or corollaries of a neglect? What are the least and most
important things that have been neglected? What can and should be learned from
the study of a neglect? What is and is not known about a neglect? Can a neglect
or omission be corrected, and what are all methods and means for repairing same?
What are all ways and dimensions by which to quantify a neglect? What is the
best way to define or describe a neglect? How is a given neglect similar to
or different from other neglects?
Among the things that may not exist (or occur) are: beginnings of the
universe, earlier universes or things preceding the universe, ends of the universe
(in time or space), other universes, other biological or intelligent life--or
other technological civilizations--in the universe, divinities, universal purposes
or 'meanings for existence', the fundamental flow of time (which could be an
illusion), fundamental physical forces (beyond the four known), exotic physical
particles (such as magnetic monopoles, subquarks, or mere gravitons), a transuranic
"island of stability", a supreme universal physical force, absolute laws of
nature--or ways around those universal laws that have been postulated, etc.
Help Explore and Exploit the Omniverse
The dictionary defines "omniverse" as a universe that is spatiotemporally four-dimensional.
The word could be used to refer to the totality of spacetime--to all that is,
has been, or will be. In ideonomy the Omniverse-- capitalized--is the
universe of all real things and real possibilities.
The Ideocosm, on the other hand, is the universe of all possible
things and ideas. This is conceived of as having a universal, unique, and necessary
structure that can be systematically and progressively explored, mapped, and
exploited. It is supposed to have its own laws, phenomena, and even forces.
However, ideonomy is a science, not a school of philosophy, and for this reason
it itself takes no stand on many deep philosophical questions in connection
with the interrelations of the Omniverse and Ideocosm that remain troublesome
and unanswered: the question, for example, as to whether the Omniverse and Ideocosm
are identical. Of course ideonomy can, and no doubt eventually will, make an
important and special contribution to the effort to clarify and resolve these
supreme problems.
Clues as to the possible interrelationship of the Omniverse and Ideocosm may
be gotten from mathematics, a science that is very similar to ideonomy and in
certain respects is synonymous. The universe that is represented by all of the
known and as yet undiscovered elements of mathematics has, it has been remarked,
a profound unity and self-connectedness. Moreover, it appears to have a queer
isomorphism to the physical universe, and to exercise either a partial or absolute
power over the latter. The logic of mathematics, that is, seems a cousin--perhaps
a twin--to physical logic. Mathematical ideas ideas rooted in mathematics--transcend
mathematics.
The stuff of the Ideocosm--its laws, phenomena, relationships, and processes--would
appear, at this early stage in the development of ideonomy, to exercise an analogous
power over physical reality.
Perhaps the patterns that define reality are simply the common property of mathematics,
ideonomy, and physics.
There are a variety of ways in which ideonomy can enable the exploration of
the Omniverse and Ideocosm.
It could begin anywhere--or with any topic, problem, or concept--and search
for things of an analogous or related nature that must coexist. It could
then define the class or classes represented thereby, or to which the things
in question simultaneously belong. It might then seek a few higher and lower
taxons that in some sense contain or are contained in that class or those classes.
Using these taxons as 'seeds', it could then define their range, structure,
and raisons d'etre more precisely-. Perhaps it would seek the principles, relationships,
or patterns that generate these taxons. In any case, it would attempt to identify,
based on the foregoing, the general taxological scheme--with all of its
many levels, elements, meanings, and extensions--that pertained to the situation.
Transformations of this scheme into other taxological schemes able to classify
other kinds of things in more or less analogous ways might be found. These classificatory
schemes could then be adapted so that they would also be able to function as
schemes defining what should or must coexist as or in connection with the new
things. Further adaptations might reveal things that must coexist within the
framework, or in terms of the joint requirements, of all or many of the different
schemes simultaneously.
Many things would have to coexist simply because they are unexpectedly tautologous.
The evolving enterprise could also require, or be made to require, simple existence--not
just the more demanding coexistence--of things.
This hints at an all-important principle: that the development of of such an
ideonomic structure or system can and should be deliberately 'pushed' in many
different directions, or forced to take on desired properties, to achieve certain
goals, and to undergo maximal or optimal growth and evolution. Bases for exponential
progress of the whole, for example, are especially important.
Such a structure or apparatus requiring in a progressive way the existence of
more and more things might only naturally point to the existence of things of
every greater diversity or range of properties; or in other words, come to require
things related to more and more of the world as we know it.
The enterprise here envisioned would not only explore a finite part of the Omniverse,
but provide infinitely reusable machinery for the further exploration of the
Omniverse in all future times. Moreover, it would inevitably enable the creation
of other and more powerful ideonomic machinery for the same purpose but on a
larger and more diverse scale.
Furthermore, in the course of time the ideonomic machinery developed for the
investigation of the Omniverse would continually increase in efficiency, flexibility,
intelligibility, automation, etc.
And of course comparable machinery could be developed for the systematic exploration
of the Ideocosm.
Suggest Opportunities
The feasibility, importance, and appropriateness of things vary profoundly as
a function of time or in various situations and circumstances.
Opportunities arise that did not previously exist, that are better than
others, that can only coexist or that inevitably coexist, that derive from earlier--or
permit subsequent--opportunities, that are incompatible or antagonistic, that
are similar or equivalent, that are different or opposite, that are orthogonal,
that are related or connected on lower or higher levels, that pertain to entire
systems or infinite chains or networks of opportunities, that are part of exponential
series of increasingly numerous, diverse, large, or better opportunities; that
are two-edged opportunities for both or either good or bad things to happen;
that if overlooked--or not exploited or appropriated--by one's self or by one
thing, are liable to be used by some competitive or inimical party, thing, phenomenon,
or tendency; that are essential or decisive for the development, course, or
transformation of a thing; that do not always exist or that are rare, unique,
or supreme; that will not persist or that are literally instantaneous; etc.
Recurring and general causes of opportunities include: coincidences or
combinations of things, drift of circumstances, anomalous events, deliberate
or spontaneous removal of obstacles, inversions or reversals of situations,
emergence of new things, maturation or evolution of things or consummation of
plans, triggers, precedents or anlages, chaos, settled conditions, attainment
or crossing of thresholds, forks in the road, search for or discovery of opportunities,
intersections of paths or convergences, errors, interruptions, collapse of the
status quo, mathematical singularities, arrival at a step or point in a sequence,
abatement of an antagonist or of opposition, other opportunities, beneficial
forces; sudden knowledge, insight, or disillusionment; appearance or acquisition
of new methods, means, or resources; disappearances of other things or the abandonment
or creation of niches, oscillations of things or cyclic events, gaining of control
over things, synergisms or 'resonances'; regeneration, repair, or correction;
external help or guidance, usefully 'analogous' situations or factors, reorientations
or redirections, changes in the environment, changes of location, trains or
chains of events, adjustments or adaptations, surprises, conflicts or other
problems, etc.
The possible range, diversity, and extremity of opportunities needs to be speculated
upon systematically. For example, might there be opportunities for: Chemical
reactions to change in mid-course or initially take very different courses;
Our universe to have taken disparate courses in the beginning; Reinforcement
and conditioning of brain states, animal behavior, or even alternative ontogeneses
of plants; Sudden establishment of a lasting world peace; Unrecognized types
of interstitial businesses; Geochemical cycles to become "chaotic"; Telephone
systems to fail in thousands of different ways; Any wrestler to
defeat any wrestler in any wrestling match; Etc?
More generally, there are constant and pervasive opportunities for: Being
heard (paid attention to); Catalysis or triggering of things; Closing deals;
Making points; Escape; Error or failure; Accidents; Catastrophe; Testing, checking,
or verifying things or performing experiments; Business enterprise; Seizing
control; Theft; Taking rest; Putting plans into effect; Correcting problems;
Effecting repairs; Deceiving people; Giving or getting misimpressions; Explaining
things; Saving money; Finishing tasks; Changing one's mind; Aborting or reversing
actions or processes; Making announcements; Altering, rearranging, or redirecting
things; Innovation, starting, or introducing things; Learning or finding things
out; Making observations or noticing things; Acquiring things; Thinking about
something; Losing things; Doing harm or destruction; Occurrence of problems;
Repeating something; Getting rid of things; Getting behind (slippage); Catching
up; Asking questions; Misunderstandings; Things failing out of adjustment; Occurrence
of chaos; Comparing one or more things; Improving, advancing, or benefiting
things; Replacing, substituting, or exchanging things; Leakage; Enjoyment; Using
things; Gaining insight into things; Conflict; Movement; Occurrence of things;
Negation or invalidation of things; Emergence of new species; Synthesis or unification;
Transitions or transformation; Emergence or development of things; Cooperation;
Interaction; Reactions or responses; Interference or disturbance; Etc.
Opportunities may cause or have as their effect, consequence, or postcedent:
No change (the status quo ante); Competition; Innovation; Conflict; Learning;
Interadjustment; Self-adjustment; Assimilation; Growth; Improvement or evolution;
Movement or relocation; Transformation; Counteractions or suppression; Other
opportunities; Continued survival; Negotiation or exchange; Ecological adaptation
or revolution; Flight; Complacency; Neglect of the opportunities; Struggle,
stress, strain, or failure; Cogitation, debate, or experimentation; Generalization
or specialization of the opportunities; Actions that secure or reinforce the
opportunities; Changing of priorities or rescheduling of things; Reinforcement
or amplification of an existent thing or situation; Reorganization or redistribution
of resources; Separation or division; Oscillations; Extension, formation of
connections, or integration; Disequilibrium; Energetic behavior; illusion; Differentiation
or dedifferentiation (relaxation); Costs, wastes, or risks; 'Winners and losers';
Freedom from constraints or liberation; Restratification; Changes of role, function,
use, value, meaning, goal, or mechanism; Etc.
Possible descriptive or other properties or dimensions of opportunities include:
age or recency, probability, reliability, availability, simplicity or complexity,
genericness or specificity, breadth, depth, clarity or obscurity, amplifiability,
interest, importance, stability, variability, competitiveness, optimality or
imperfection, controllability and manipulability, multiplicity of significance,
rarity or frequency, analogizability or uniqueness, essentiality, persistence,
priority, exploitability, purity, proximity, imminence, magnitude, number, fungibility,
investigability, range and diversity, reducibility and separability, etc.
Point To the Ways In Which Opposites Meet
and Merge
When things of an opposite or seemingly antithetical nature meet, intersect,
unite, mimic one another, or exhibit interdependence, complementarity, or synergism,
this is termed antisyzygy or an example of antisyzygy.
The inevitability, ubiquity, endless recurrence, fundamentality, universality,
infinite diversity, essentiality, and complexity of antisyzygies--throughout
nature and in every dimension of our lives--makes the subject one of the most
profound and important in all of ideonomy.
The relevant questions are: What are all known and possible opposites
to all known and possible phenomena, concepts, entities, quantities, terms,
principles, processes, etc? What are all of the known and possible ways, senses,
and degrees in which all such opposites 'meet'? What are all of the known and
possible effects, corollaries, importances, and implications of antisyzygies?
What are all of the ways in which, and reasons for which, opposites do not
meet? What are all known and possible direct and indirect causes, mechanisms,
and geneses of antisyzygies? What are the laws and principles of antisyzygies?
How can antisyzygies be usefully exploited? How do different antisyzygies interact,
cooperate, and conflict? What are all possible levels, dimensions, and meta-structures
of antisyzygies? How can all antisyzygies be classified in terms of one another,
and what are their analogies, differences, and complete relationships? What
are all of the properties, forms of behavior, and transformations of antisyzygies?
What do we know and what do we not know--or what must we learn and what might
we discover--about antisyzygies? What practical and fundamental problems are
associated with antisyzygies?
Some of the reasons why, or ways in which, opposites meet include: Coessentially
or essentially they may be the same; They may differ only by a trivial enantiomorphism
or the equivalent; They may be complementary or co- necessary (e.g. as contrasts);
They may be 'dialectically' interlacing, contrapuntal, intersecting, or oscillatory;
They may be cut across by orthogonal dimensions; They may be ambiguous, or not
be fundamental or real; They may be more complex than they would be if they
were, say, 1- dimensionally bipolar or antithetical; They may be continuously
or partially intergraded; They themselves may not be the maximal or true
extremes or antitheses; They may be coinfinite and hence subject to the many
paradoxes of infinity; They may be equivalent, identical, or nonexistent from
the standpoint of infinite complexity (or the Greek apeiron); They may have
an infinity of different related and unrelated senses; They may co-occur or
associate; They may be convergent; Etc.
Illustrative examples of opposites that meet include: Laughing and
crying (one may cry because one is so happy; or laugh because crying or
sadness seems so ridiculous or disaster so total; or be at once happy and sad
owing to a janus-faced event, such as the marital loss of one's daughter); Giving
and receiving (giving brings joy-the joy of giving; giving may have selfish
motives; and giving involves or maintains reciprocity and equilibrium); Honesty
and mendacity (as with an honest liar, dishonest or misleading candor, or
the dishonest honest man--so honest as to approach dishonesty); Problem and
opportunity (all problems are also opportunities--to learn, enjoy life,
gain advantages over the lax, or find out about oneself; and all opportunities,
in turn, create or involve many problems); Poverty and riches (wealth
can impoverish, poverty can amplify the meaning and joy of tiny things); Perfection
and imperfection (perfection bares imperfection and gives rise to new problems
and flaws; imperfection creates and reveals possibilities for perfection); Etc.
Reveal Underlying Order
By "order" here, is not simply meant pattern, sequence, form, law, manifold,
control, relationships, or the like, but something more fundamental that is
hard to define, either to other persons or to oneself. Although a more satisfying
definition will have to remain a problem for the future, a partial characterization
of order is possible now, or at least there are things that can be said that
will point the reader's mind in the right direction.
Order, then, might be understood to represent an especially, or perhaps maximally,
fundamental level, type, or sense of structure; or whatever kinds or concepts
of structure are most apt to transcend place, time, detail, variation, discoveries
of new phenomena, substitutions of one class of phenomenon for another, movement
from one science or subject to another, or even changes of perspective or logic.
In a crude sense, order refers to the actual or possible arrangements of things
in nature or the mind. It might also be said to designate the generic or specific
structure of any physical or abstract space; or the essence of any spatial,
temporal, or semantic manifold. It signifies the interrelation of the deepest
categories of reality, and the derivation of lesser order therefrom.
The basic problem in defining order is that it is so fundamental that
all the terms that we are compelled to rely upon in an effort to define it are
necessarily less fundamental, and the opportunistic employment of such gross
means warps and cheapens the reality. A somewhat similar difficulty is encountered
in quantum physics, in the attempt to use quantum entities or terms to characterize
themselves.
A sense of the supreme importance of order may be gotten from the fact that
mathematics has been defined as the science of order (as has ideonomy itself,
for that matter).
Clarifying the nature, kinds, and processes of order can clarify all else, indirectly
or directly, because in a sense everything else depends upon order and simply
expresses its manifold possibilities.
If science benefits from research into its foundations, and order represents
the foundations of all foundations, then the scientific investigation of order
cannot help but improve science.
If the topic of order has hitherto been neglected, however, that could only
have been because of the special difficulty of the subject. Or possibly the
blame must be shared by the fanatical specialization of science, since the subject
of order, being the most universal, demands for its advancement an opposite
cast of mind, or a willingness to think in the most generalized terms.
No doubt the pathetic cleavage between the mathematician and the scientist has
also frustrated progress in understanding and exploiting order.
Order either stands or operates at the crossroads of the mind and physical or
external reality. Research, discoveries, and possibilities in the three complementary
fields of neurology, noology, and artificial intelligence have therefore a deep
interest to the student of order, as also must the profound contribution that
ideonomy can make to the furtherance of those subjects.
There is a chance that reality is infinitely complex, and if it is infinitely
complex, then the study of order is infinitely important, for order must be
the source of that complexity, as well as the key to its mental simplification.
Power, both cognitive and practical, springs from mastery of order.
Order might be described as the language of nature. It is a language that should
be progressively deciphered and taught to the newest and youngest minds. Arguably
it should be taught before all other subjects, given its purity, elementariness,
universality, and fertility, and the relative superficiality of all else. If
other subjects and things are taught first they will permanently blind, prejudice,
and cruden the mind, whereas if the mind awakens to a clear vision of order
itself it will commence life with a stupendous advantage.
The objective of ideonomy is to gradually identify all species, genera, and
taxons of order, to classify them into a pyramid of levels, and to interrelate
them as a continuum at once infinitely complex and infinitely simple and specific;
or negatively expressed, it is to avoid any illusorily truncated treatment of
these things.
Up until now, the scientist and mathematician have almost always been content
merely to discriminate different classes of order, and have rarely made the
additional effort to link and synthesize them, qua complementary, synergistic,
and coessential aspects of the same, or some greater, reality.
The ideonomist, per contra, is interested in working out, not just all
the types of order, but the system of all their combinations, permutations,
transformations, and equivalences. What, for example, are all of the ways in
which one type of order can combine with itself, or with any and all other types
of order? How can all types of order be derived from any single type of order?
The different types of order can be mapped into a common space. Such mapping
can reveal their redundancy and irredundancy, clustering and overlapping, differential
generality, dimensions and dimensionality, interconnectivity, behavior, completeness
and incompleteness, boundaries, metastructures, homology, interoperation, oppositeness
and antisyzygies, etc.
Among the questions about order that ideonomy can help us to address are:
What causes particular types of order to exist in particular cases or situations?
What contradictions and conflicts exist among different types of order? How
ordered are things? Why are types of order absent at times? What are the immediate
and long-term consequences of given types of order? What finite and infinite
groups of order are there? What methods and means are there for determining
the existence of types of order? What is essential and extraneous to forms of
order? How does order grade off into things that are not actually order but
that are related or analogous to it? What means and ways are there for representing
different types of order? What illusions, fallacies, and errors pertain to different
types of order? What are the extremes of, and in connection with, all forms
of order? How knowledgeable and ignorant are we about order? Is order relative
or absolute? What are the dynamics or temporal patterns associated with types
of order? What are the potential uses of various forms of order, and what are
the functions and roles of order in nature and civilization? What methods can
be devised for investigating order, and what is it that is important for us
to find out about it? What rules and principles are there for working with forms
of order? What are the costs and penalties of various forms of order?
Ideonomy could help one espy underlying order in such things as: Brain
waves (the EEG), Neural networks (no general theory of which exists at present),
Patterns of human behavior, Genetic control or evolution of the phenotype, Statistical
data sets, Music, Surface waves of the sun, So-called elementary particles,
Patterns of clouds in Earth's atmosphere, Economic fluctuations, Cosmic structure
and dynamics, Esoteric patterns in number theory, Idea-maps created via MDS
(multidimensional scaling), The visual structure of scenes, Etc.
There are probably many things that are not perceivable, conceivable, or doable
in the absence of knowledge of relevant order.
Things can appear completely different when reseen from the perspective of an
alternative form of order.
The content, relationships, and meanings of things or sensory experiences may
be much more diverse than can be imagined when one relies upon the logic of
a narrow form or spectrum of order.
New types of order, or greater knowledge of order, can permit one to do things
far more efficiently, appropriately, confidently, systematically, thoroughly,
flexibly, authentically, etc.
Much of what seems to be random, amorphous, accidental, chaotic, indeterminate,
meaningless, inconsistent, directionless, illogical, complex, or the like may
turn out to be quite the contrary when it viewed in an appropriately ordered
way.
There can be many different types-of-types of order, or at least different schematizations
of order.
Thus one type-of-type of order might include: recurrence, identity, concinnity,
continuity, isochrony, etc.
Whereas in another type-of-type, or scheme, of order there might be such natural,
named, or convenient types of order as: automorphistic, holomorphic, holonomic,
meromorphic, symplectic, renormalizational, etc. (Many of the latter correspond
to mathematical groups.)
Scientific revolutions have often been a direct or indirect result of the discovery
of a new type of order, extension or generalization of an old form of order,
or working out of the theory of some type of order. Certainly any of
the latter things will often trigger major and minor revolutions in science,
technology, and society.
Yet ideonomy has the potential to bring about deliberate and mass discovery
of new types of order, or to drastically accelerate human exploration, discovery,
and utilization of new or all possible types and schemes of order.
The remarkable thing about the discovery of some fundamentally new class of
order is that it can simultaneously entrain breakthroughs almost everywhere
in science. Today we are witnessing such transdisciplinary rashes of discoveries
in connection with chaotic, fractal, cellular-automaton, spin- glass, and other
types of order,
Explicate Origin
By origin is meant the start of a thing: the fact, how, why, or possibilities
of any beginning. In the vocabulary of ideonomy, origins are not synonymous
with geneses, histories, causes, or emergents.
But even in this restricted sense, origins are a primary concern of every science
and of practically every area of scholarship.
Ideonomy is a universal science that is at once capable of facilitating inquiry
into the origins of things as diverse as: A biont, Great religions, A lightning
bolt, Albert Einstein's relativity concepts (in his childhood development),
Animal trails (in the forest; in time, in space, or starting species), Aristotelian
two-valued logic (the process of logical or dichotomic affirmation and negation;
in evolution, human history, or psychogenesis), Brain waves, Gambling (in the
history of civilization), Cancer, Matter (baryons and leptons), the Mississippi
River, Mathematics (say the concept of number), Or one's marriage.
Where in a symphony can one theme properly be said to originate from another?
From what did all that we term the universe itself originate? When in life did
the most rudimentary form of one's self originate; what was the moment before
and after which one existed?
Among the systematic ways in which ideonomy will be able to clarify origin
are: By reducing origins to general or universal taxons; By encouraging
analogies between seemingly unrelated origins and types of origins of seemingly
unrelated things; By highlighting the differences among origins; By defining
the finite ways in which, alone, things can originate; By distinguishing the
different stages and degrees of origins; By demonstrating how things cooriginate;
By proving the necessity for things to originate in certain ways; By describing
the relationships, environments, and circumstances associated with origins;
By enlarging the meaning of origin; By bounding, limiting, and qualifying origin;
By rigorously illustrating how combinations of elements can originate different
or like things; By revealing characteristic convergences and divergences of
things; By identifying paradoxes connected with origins; By revealing the true
complexity and simplicity of origination, Etc.
The importance of origins or of their study includes: Their value in
defining things; Classificatory power; The utility of precising the temporal
range of things; Identification of lineages and affiliations; Exclusion of confusable
and erroneous origins; Enablement of predictions; Confirmation of theories and
hypotheses; Specification of the substantial nature of things; Indexing of the
quantity (population, frequency, probability, dominance, etc) of things; Mapping
things into a general framework; Etc.
What is all that we know, or do not know, about the origin of a single, random
thing?
With what priority should the origin of different things be inquired into?
What origins are interdependent and independent?
What is the relative contribution of chance and law to different origins and
types of origins?
What are the chained, hierarchic, and reticular relationships among different
origins?
The generic causes of origins of things are, for example: Maturation
of an underlying productive process; Temporary or permanent disappearance or
inhibition of whatever has been preventing something from originating; Development
of a need or requirement for the thing; Conjunction of 'mutually' necessary
factors or events; Simultaneous origin of something else; Transformation from
one regime or epoch to another; Transformation of a thing into a new thing;
Simple recognition of the preexistence of a thing (producing a virtual
origin); Attainment of some relative criterion for a thing's existence or origin
(representing another instance of virtual origin); Etc.
Exploit Paradoxes
Discovery, explanation, application, generalization, and transcendence of paradox
accounts for a great deal of human progress. Anything that can contribute to
the process can help advance civilization.
The reasons for this are many: Paradox checks arrogance; Paradox can
reveal and index unsuspected underlying complexity; Paradox may also indicate
the possibility of some peculiar simplification in a difficult situation; Many
paradoxes spring from antisyzygies (meetings of opposites in the greater nature
of things); Paradoxes can afford at least partial freedom to escape from rigid
laws, limitations of situations, and supposed absolutes; Confronting paradox
can lead to a reformation of one's mind or a greater wisdom; Paradox is often
associated with the emergence of novel categories of things; Etc.
There are many general forms of paradox that occur over and over again:
Augmentation leading to diminution, Self-annihilating existence, Self- generation,
Equivalence or meeting of opposites, Self-contradiction, Self- divergence, Self-avoidance,
Ignorance or incapacity produced by knowledge, Bad associated with or engendering
good, Good associated with or engendering bad, Simultaneous existence of a thing
at many levels (of space, time, etc), Disproportionate importance of seemingly
insignificant things, Coexistence of contrafactuals, Fundamental immeasurability
or indeterminacy, Self- containment, Nonlinearities, Etc.
Paradox is defined in five ways by Webster's III: A tenet or proposition
contrary to received opinion; A statement or sentiment that is seemingly contradictory
or opposed to common sense and yet perhaps true in fact; A statement that is
actually self-contradictory and hence false even though its true character is
not immediately apparent; An argument that apparently derives self-contradictory
conclusions by valid deduction from acceptable premises; and Something (as a
human being, phenomenon, state of affairs, or action) with seemingly contradictory
qualities or phases.
Hence orthodoxy can be challenged and often errs, what seems obvious and entirely
logical may be wrong, a valid proposition may invalidate itself on another,
higher, or lower conceptual level, a proposition may be covertly self-inconsistent,
and an entity may transcend in its complexity any conventional harmony of its
elements.
Conventional concepts and words are in their simplicity and familiarity chronically
confused with the different, stranger, and greater things and realities to which
they lamely point, which gives rise to discoveries that are much of what we
mean by paradox.
The awkwardness of reason is another parent of paradox. Reason looses itself
in its own complexity and forgets the truncation of its analysis that is perpetually
necessary. Logic has a life of its own: an organic evolution and a continuity
of curious idiosyncrasies, prejudices, and errors; its recursive essence is
forever overlooked. As reason adapts to receive truth it distorts it.
Clarify Pathology
The tentative view of the ideonomist is that 'disease' (or what it prefers to
refer to, generically, as pathosis) is fundamentally an altogether universal
phenomenon that completely transcends biology, organisms, or the realm of life,
a phenomenon whose infinite analogical diversity is exemplified by, in, or through
all entities, relationships, processes, and systems in all sciences
and subjects.
By pathosis is meant an abnormal state or condition that develops progressively,
is complex, specific, and characteristic, has a certain autonomy, has a transformative
effect, mimics some of the properties of biological organisms (say by seeming
to propagate or adapt), and/or the like.
Already diseases of the psyche and a society are recognized, and the term is
applied to some phenomena in technology (in materials, computer, and food science,
for example). What is termed pathological in mathematics is not unrelated to
this generalized concept of disease.
Often what are otherwise normal or characteristic behaviors, laws, or properties
become so extreme that we say they are pathological. In special regimes or circumstances
what is otherwise normal becomes pathological. Pathology can arise suddenly
and seemingly spontaneously from random or very subtle causes.
Pathological behavior may result when the burden upon things is too great, or
when too much is asked of them.
Other generic causes of pathosis include: aging, decay, obsolescence,
misuse, conflict, self-interference, isolation, excessive feedback (either positive
or negative), overcomplexity, overspecialization, hurry, over- connectedness,
inflexibility, indeterminacy, mimicry or self-mimicry, resonant coupling, oscillation,
"chaotic" behavior, excessive threshold dependence, pluralism, resource shortages,
inconsistent 'programs', growth, etc.
Many such causes may conspire to produce a pathosis.
Remaking pathology into a theoretical and transdisciplinary science is vital
in our increasingly complex, abstract, and integrated world.
Confronting pathology will afford us a chance to remove many of the infirmities
of nature and civilization that hitherto we have had to take for granted.
Also, the truly pathological or "bad" character of pathoses is relative, and
as science and technology become more sophisticated it will be possible to find
virtues in and exploit ever more, and ever more diverse, pathoses.
Moreover, ideonomy has led to the conjecture that in biology both "good" and
bad diseases may exist, with the former being as common and important as the
latter.
To the extent that bad pathosis is universal, 'good pathosis' may play an equally
general, but even less recognized, role in nature.
Some purely fanciful examples of pathoses in various fields are: Supernova
epidemics in galaxies (though actually astronomers have often proposed the operation
of such contagions), Terrestrial epochs of catastrophic volcanism (say of idiopathic
character), Rashes of propagative defects in crystals, 'Conspiracies' of message
errors in the brain's interneuronal traffic, Self- destructive cycles of the
universe (if it is oscillatory) or self-destructive universes (if there are
many cosmoses), Sudden and inexplicable transformation of good weather or climate
into bad, "Chaotic" oscillations of the stock market or world economy, Contradictions
(or simple indeterminacies) in a noble ethic degenerating it to sordor in the
course of time, Debilitating changes of a language occurring historically in
a multiplicative cascade, Purely chemical 'infections' destroying the taste
of wine or some other stored food, Etc.
Abiotic pathoses are such an unexplored territory that it is exceedingly hard
to even imagine the possibilities.
But with respect to universal pathoses ideonomy can systematically work out
the generic: causes, mechanisms, effects, types, components, properties,
indications, interactions, rules, abilities, hierarchies, sequences, solutions
(or 'therapies'), questions, problems, theories, implications, etc.
By aiding the treatment of pathoses, ideonomy should have the effect of gradually
raising levels of: efficiency, excellence, economy, health, longevity, conservation,
safety, stability, power, capacity, precision, control, evolution, simulation,
etc.
Biological and abiotic pathology will progressively clarify one another.
Deeper, broader, analogous, and divergent causes and effects of pathology will
be recognized thanks to ideonomic research.
Many medical diseases are probably related, identical, or virtually identical
after a simple ideonomic transformation; and many others, on the other hand,
are probably divisible into various separate and unrelated diseases. Many such
diseases probably have simple mathematical or physical causes and solutions
that are abundantly illustrated in inanimate nature and that can only be obscured
by a narrowly or essentially biological approach. A single disease thought to
have a few forms may in fact have a thousand different forms and manifestations
or be distinct in all of its occurrences. A few powerful laws may give rise
to virtually all diseases.
These questions and matters are the sort that ideonomy is designed to illuminate.
Ideonomy can clarify the basic dimensions of all pathology, including those
suggested by such questions as: What are the slowest, most persistent, or
longest-lived, and the fastest, most ephemeral, or most fragile, of all pathoses?
What pathoses are rarest or the most ubiquitous? What are the most hidden pathoses?
Are pathoses of finite or infinite diversity? Are pathoses linked or independent?
What, spatially or massively, are the smallest, and what are the largest, pathoses?
What are the simplest and most complex pathoses? What are the most extreme pathoses?
What basic categories of pathosis can be imagined but do not exist in nature?
Help One Discern Patterns
There are countless senses, types, and examples of pattern: Style or
law of behavior; Typical or apparent course of development; Internal, external,
comparative, or reciprocal structure; Configuration, distribution, or grouping;
Cluster of traits, acts, properties, elements, or tendencies; Habit, tendency,
or history; Systematic quality; Analogical character; Quiddity; Holistic character;
Higher-level , abstract, or final pattern; Etc.
The ideonomist is especially interested in patterns that represent meta- phenomena,
archetypal phenomena, and phenomena nearly of the status of entities
but that are not quite entities. Meta-phenomena are higher-order phenomena
or phenomenon-like patterns-of-patterns. Archetypal phenomena are that
quasi-finite set of physical or mental phenomena that are, or that are treated
as being, the most universal, fundamental, important, characteristic, necessary,
explanatory, simple, regular, multiform, etc, or to which all other known or
discoverable phenomena can in some sense be reduced. Some phenomena naturally
approximate to entities without quite being entities; their resemblance to entities
being due to their imperfect: individuality, persisting and characteristic effects,
organizing and self-organizing tendencies, qualitative distinctness, meaningfulness,
e/vc.
Recognizing patterns is important because they can indicate things':
forms, laws, histories, courses, activities, relationships, causes, effects,
origins, destinations, present status, quantitative properties, differences,
internal content or structure, mechanisms, methods, problems, needs, values,
'languages', forces, etc.
Patterns are present all the time, everywhere, and in everything, but often
they are overlooked because of their subtlety or because the mind is ignorant
of the language that is necessary for perceiving or even imagining them. The
density and diversity of natural patterns may even be infinite.
Ideonomy may be the ultimate key to making sense of this ocean of patterns,
for it is essentially a qualitative universe defined by and defining an infinite
interweaving of ideas. Patterns lead to other patterns because there are lawful
transformations of ideas.